306 citations across 153 events
Sources and methodology
Where this record comes from, how a claim gets in, how dates are handled when the evidence disagrees, and what this project cannot tell you.
The source hierarchy
Not all evidence is equal, and a record that treats it as though it were is not much use. Sources are weighted in the following order, and an entry is only published when at least two independent sources support it.
- Primary documents and archival holdings. Patents, contemporary trade press, production paperwork, surviving prints and the catalog records of the institutions that hold them.
- Institutional research. Published work by national libraries, film archives, museums and universities, including collection essays, exhibition scholarship and preservation notes.
- Edited reference works. Encyclopaedias and standard histories with named editorial oversight and a correction process.
- Peer-reviewed scholarship. Academic work in film and media history, used particularly where a question is contested.
Open wikis, fan compilations, unsourced articles and aggregated content are not treated as authorities. They are occasionally useful for finding a document, which is then verified directly against the institution that holds it.
How a date is established
Film history contains an unusual number of different dates for the same event, because there are genuinely several dates to choose from. A premiere, a general release, a trade screening, a patent filing and a patent grant are distinct events, and this record names which one it is reporting.
Where documentation supports an exact day, an exact day is given. Where it supports only a month or a year, only a month or a year appears. Approximation is stated rather than disguised as precision.
When historians disagree
Some events have no settled date. In those cases the record reports the disagreement rather than resolving it by preference. An early British object-animation film is deliberately included on that basis: its dating has been argued between 1899 and the First World War for decades, and the entry says so instead of asserting one.
The problem with firsts
Claims of the form “the first animated film” are almost always underspecified. First projected to a paying audience? First photographed on standard motion picture film? First composed entirely of sequential drawings, with no live-action framing? These describe three different films in three different countries, and all three claims are true under their own definition.
This record therefore qualifies every such claim. Where a widely repeated first is inaccurate, the entry corrects it and explains what the accurate version is.
Surviving works and documented works
A significant portion of animation made before 1930 no longer exists. The first animated feature, made in Argentina in 1917, survives only in documentation. Most of the hand-painted bands projected in Paris in the 1890s were destroyed by the man who made them. Several early Japanese films were lost to fire and war.
Events supported only by documentation are included when the documentation is strong, and the absence of the work is stated in the entry. A record that admitted only surviving prints would misrepresent the history badly, particularly outside Western Europe and the United States.
What we do not do
- We do not reproduce film frames, character designs, posters or promotional artwork. Every illustration on this site was made for it.
- We do not present box-office figures, budgets or drawing counts as exact when the underlying sources round or estimate them.
- We do not repeat a widely circulated anecdote because it is well known. If it cannot be traced to a source, it does not appear.
- We do not quietly adjust entries. Substantive changes are logged under the corrections policy.
Known limits of this record
Three limitations are worth stating plainly. First, the record is weighted towards the United States, Western Europe and Japan, because that is where the institutional documentation is most complete in English — not because animation elsewhere was less significant. Animation histories in Eastern Europe, Latin America, South Asia, Africa and China are under-represented here and we are working to improve that.
Second, technical and industrial events are easier to date than artistic developments. A patent has a filing date; a change in how animators think about weight does not. The timeline structure quietly favors the former, and the decade essays exist partly to compensate.
Third, recent events are the hardest to assess. Significance is a judgment about consequences, and consequences take years to become visible. Entries from the last decade are the ones most likely to be revised.
Institutions and reference works cited
The following organizations are cited across this record. Links go to the collections, catalogs and reference works consulted; where an institution has reorganised its holdings, the link points to the collection landing page rather than to a document that may have moved.
| Encyclopaedia Britannica | Cited in 86 records |
|---|---|
| Library of Congress | Cited in 63 records |
| Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences | Cited in 38 records |
| ACM SIGGRAPH | Cited in 26 records |
| British Film Institute | Cited in 22 records |
| Academy Museum of Motion Pictures | Cited in 22 records |
| National Film Archive of Japan | Cited in 13 records |
| Cinémathèque française | Cited in 8 records |
| Computer History Museum | Cited in 8 records |
| Bill Douglas Cinema Museum, University of Exeter | Cited in 4 records |
| National Film Board of Canada | Cited in 3 records |
| The Museum of Modern Art | Cited in 2 records |
| Deutsche Kinemathek | Cited in 2 records |
| The Walt Disney Family Museum | Cited in 2 records |
| The Royal Society | Cited in 1 record |
| The Getty Museum | Cited in 1 record |
| George Eastman Museum | Cited in 1 record |
| Smithsonian Institution | Cited in 1 record |
| Smithsonian Magazine | Cited in 1 record |
| University of Exeter | Cited in 1 record |
| Filmoteca de Catalunya, via Encyclopaedia Britannica | Cited in 1 record |
Found a problem?
Reports of factual errors are welcome and are acted on. The corrections policy explains what to include and how quickly you will hear back.